top of page

Our Cases
Filter By:
This suit alleged multiple occurrences of inaccessible parking structures at the University of Washington, Seattle Campus. The parties reached a settlement agreement that addresses these accessibility concerns and provides modifications of the parking areas causing barriers.
In collaboration with Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center (CREEC), Conrad Reynoldson advocated as a named plaintiff in a class-action suit requiring the City of Seattle to install or remediate over 20,000 curb ramps throughout Seattle over the next 18 years. The Court granted final approval of the settlement on November 1, 2017.
This suit alleged discriminatory ticketing policies, accessible parking, ramp, and seating violations at the University of Washington’s Alaska Airlines Arena at Hec Edmundson Pavilion. The parties reached a settlement agreement that addresses these allegations.
This suit alleged discriminatory amphitheater accessible seating and ticketing policies and practices as well as accessible route and accessible parking violations at the Chateau Ste. Michelle Amphitheater and Winery. The parties reached a confidential settlement agreement.
This suit alleged noncompliant accessible routes, concessions, restrooms, drinking fountains, and seating at the Moore and Paramount Theatres in Seattle, WA as well as noncompliant ticketing policies and practices. Defendant accepted the judgment.
This suit alleges noncompliant accessible parking. pay kiosks, signage and routes to accessible parking at 158 parking facilities operated by Republic Parking Northwest. These parking facilities are located throughout western Washington from Everett to Tacoma.
This suit alleges discriminatory ticketing policies by AMC. AMC charges people with disabilities who require the assistance of a caregiver for said caregivers admission. We allege that this amounts to a discriminatory surcharge for individuals with disabilities who require the assistance of a caregiver in order to attend movies in the theater.
This suit alleges discriminatory treatment and failure to ensure medically necessary access to gluten-free meals to a plaintiff with celiac disease. Mr. Picciano was held by Defendants for 22 days without food that he could safely eat. We allege that discriminatory treatment and failure to provide a reasonable dietary accommodation resulted in illness, loss of consciousness, hospitalization, the loss of a significant percentage of his body weight, and short and long- term damage and injury.
bottom of page